Robocurve says Opus 5.5 matches Astra on robots for 21% less

Across 360 real-robot trials, Opus 5.5 averaged 36% progress at an estimated 90 cents per run; Astra completed more tasks outright.

By · Published

Primary source: X

Why it matters

The benchmark puts a measurable cost and performance comparison on real robot trials, while its selection of Astra's easiest tasks and low completion counts show why average progress alone is an incomplete proxy for useful autonomy.

A sleek robotic arm performs a precise task with a small component on a workbench in a modern lab.

On September 23rd, Jay Chooi (@chooi_jeq) and four colleagues at Robocurve reported that Opus 5.5 achieved nearly the same average progress as GPT-6 Astra across 360 real-robot trials, at a lower estimated model-inference cost. The comparison comes from Robocurve's own RoboDojo-RC Tier 1 report, which also makes clear what the headline averages leave out: Astra completed five tasks, while Opus 5.5 completed one.…

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

Reader comments

Conversation for this story loads after sign-in.