当 OpenAI 在沙发上睡觉时,Microsoft 让 Anthropic 搬进来了
一份未发布的 Claude for Windows 构建显示,Anthropic 正将自身更深地接入 Microsoft 的企业身份堆栈,与此同时,那段定义了 AI 繁荣最初几年的合作关系正变得不再那么排他。
By Ryan Merket · Published
RUNTIMEWIRE INVESTIGATION — Original analysis
Original reporting by RuntimeWire, based on documents, reverse engineering.
为何重要
企业 AI 的分发越来越通过身份、安全和采购来进行。Anthropic 现在在 Microsoft 的客户群中将这三者整合在一起——在一个深度上,RuntimeWire 没有发现任何公开证据表明 OpenAI 在其自己的 Windows 客户端曾获得过这样的深度集成。
Reporting record
Finding
Claude for Windows version 1.49585.0 contains new Microsoft-specific enterprise authentication infrastructure, including explicit support for Entra Continuous Access Evaluation, a local Windows authentication broker and additional enterprise credential paths.
How we verified
Methods: documents, reverse engineering.
Static analysis of Claude for Windows versions 1.49585.0 and 1.46388.4 identified new CAE configuration markers, default-enabled CAE, Microsoft cp1 capability references, local broker code, enterprise credential options and sovereign-cloud handling; Microsoft and Anthropic documentation provided context.
RuntimeWire compared the two distributed Claude for Windows binaries, examining application resources, configuration markers and authentication code, and compared the findings with Microsoft and Anthropic documentation.
Tested versions:
- Claude for Windows 1.49585.0
- Claude for Windows 1.46388.4
Reproduction
Reproduction does not apply to this reporting (document-driven).
Company response
RuntimeWire requested comment; the company had not responded by publication time.
RuntimeWire asked Anthropic whether the broker and CAE implementation is intended for its existing Microsoft 365 connector, a Windows-specific implementation or another enterprise deployment architecture.

Microsoft 和 OpenAI 仍然在一起。但 Anthropic 似乎已经把牙刷带进了浴室,并且能够访问 Entra。
RuntimeWire 在最新的 Claude for Windows 构建中发现了新的面向 Microsoft 的企业身份验证基础设施,其中包括对 Microsoft Entra Continuous Access Evaluation 的显式支持、Windows 原生的身份验证中介以及针对受管理企业环境的额外凭证路径。…
When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.