旧版 Digg 正在回归，代码揭示了未发布的用户投稿流程，本周用户投票功能已恢复
RuntimeWire 找到了一条从源 URL 到可编辑草稿和故事预览的路径，扩展了 Digg 最近回归读者参与的举措。
By Ryan Merket · Published
RUNTIMEWIRE INVESTIGATION — Original analysis
Original reporting by RuntimeWire, based on documents, reverse engineering.
为何重要
读者投票为 Digg 提供了一个直接的受众信号，用于对故事进行排名。是否读者也可以引入故事在公开的产品信息中仍未解决：Digg 的条款称不接受提交，而条款中关于账户的措辞似乎未能跟上九月的投票变更。
Reporting record
Finding
RuntimeWire found code describing an unreleased flow from a source URL to an editable story draft and preview, but the available code does not establish a working submission action.
How we verified
Methods: documents, reverse engineering.
RuntimeWire's examination of Digg code supports the source-to-draft-to-preview flow; Digg's September 22 announcement confirms the return of reader voting but does not announce submissions.
RuntimeWire examined available Digg code for the flow and reviewed Digg's public voting announcement and terms. The reconstructed screens illustrate the proposed experience and are not evidence of a live feature.
Reproduction
Reproduction does not apply to this reporting (document-driven).
Company response
The company was not contacted before publication.
RuntimeWire 发现了一段关于 Digg 未发布流程的代码，该流程会将来源 URL 通过可编辑的故事草稿并进行预览。代码描述了读者以一个链接开始，编辑草稿，然后预览该故事在 Digg 上可能的展示方式。该流程尚未公开宣布，RuntimeWire 对其界面的重建并不能证明这是一个已上线的功能。
RuntimeWire 在几小时前巧合地推出了一个相关的读者提交功能。根据 RuntimeWire 的帖子，读者可以提交故事想法，自己撰写草稿或获得帮助准备草稿，然后审阅完成的草稿并选择何时将其提交给编辑。
ttps://x.com/runtimewire/status/2103695696519905480…
When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.