OpenAI 要求法院驳回关于谁可以执行其 AGI 使命的诉讼
Alec Willerman 是一名正在建立以人工智能为重点的法律业务的律师，他希望就 OpenAI 承诺造福人类是否会产生个人受托权利作出裁定。
By Ryan Merket · Published
RUNTIMEWIRE INVESTIGATION — Original analysis
Original reporting by RuntimeWire, based on documents.
为何重要
该案的争点在于，一家公司的公共利益使命是否赋予个人提起诉讼的个人权利，还是该等主张的执行仅限于依法授权的当事方。该案并不裁定该使命是否存在或已得到履行。
Reporting record
Finding
OpenAI Foundation's demurrer argues that Willerman has no personal right to enforce OpenAI's AGI mission, while his complaint asks the court to decide whether such a right exists; the court had not ruled in the materials reviewed.
How we verified
Methods: documents.
Willerman's three-page complaint and the Foundation's demurrer, together with OpenAI's governance account and Anthropic's proposal announcement.
Reviewed the complaint and demurrer in the case materials, then compared their arguments with the companies' public descriptions of their governance structures and proposals.
Reproduction
Reproduction does not apply to this reporting (document-driven).
Company response
The company was not contacted before publication.
OpenAI Foundation 于 10 月 8 日向旧金山法院请求驳回由 Alec Willerman 提起的诉讼，理由是 OpenAI 致力于确保通用人工智能（AGI）造福人类的使命并未赋予他个人可执行受托义务的权利。该案件提出的问题是，谁（如果有人）可以将公司诉诸法庭以执行该承诺。
Willerman 于 8 月 27 日在未聘律师的情况下提交了三页的诉状，根据 经 RuntimeWire 审阅的案件备案。他请求法院声明 OpenAI 对使用其最大努力确保 AGI 在尊重他的个人意志和自由的前提下造福他负有受托义务。或者，他请求法院声明不存在此类义务。他的诉状声称 OpenAI 承担了对全人类的义务，该义务适用于每一个自然人，并且正在将对 AGI 开发的控制权让渡给一个关联实体。这些是指控，不是裁定。…
When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.